High CourtsDIVISION BENCH

Ram Charitra Rai & Ors. vs The State of Bihar, & Ors.

Patna High Court · Decided on 30 March 2017 · Citation: (2017) 03 PAT CK 0088

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Nilu Agrawal
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
1279 of 2015

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

18 paragraphs · 146 words
1.

Heard counsel for the appellants, counsel for the

respondents including the State.

2.

The dismissal of the writ application vide order dated

01.07.2015 by the learned single Judge is the cause for the appellants

to prefer this appeal under Letters Patent.

3.

There is nothing illegal about the learned single Judge

refusing to exercise discretion under Article 226 of the Constitution

of India especially when there is a statutory appeal available against

the impugned order to the appellants.

4.

Whatever submissions, which have been made by the

learned counsel representing the appellants, before us can also be

appreciated by the appellate authority and none of the submissions

are of a kind which cannot be heard and decided in appeal.

5.

No interference, therefore, is warranted with the order

impugned.

6.

Appeal is dismissed.

7.

Appellants are free to file appeal even now if they

choose.