High CourtsDIVISION BENCH

Sheo Shankar Yadav vs The State of Bihar

Patna High Court · Decided on 1 March 2017 · Citation: (2017) 03 PAT CK 0002

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Nilu Agrawal
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
1522 of 2013

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

20 paragraphs · 175 words
1.

Heard counsel for the appellants and counsel for the

State.

2.

Delay of 14 days in filing the appeal is condoned.

I.A. No. 8396 of 2013 is allowed. Matter is heard on

merits.

3.

The learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ

application giving liberty to the appellants to move the appropriate

forum for redressal of grievances. Such a direction dated 03.04.2013

is under challenge in the present appeal.

4.

Writ was filed by the appellants alleging that certain

part of their raiyati land has been encroached for construction of

school building, Nala and a road. The report of the Block

Development Officer, Bachhawara is that there is no such

encroachment and measurement was done in presence of the Anchal

Amin and report was produced. Such a dispute cannot be decided

under Article 226 of the Constitution, in fact, it will be in the interest

of the petitioners, may be to file a suit and a petition for injunction for

appropriate declaration.

5.

No interference is warranted with the impugned order.

Appeal is dismissed.