High CourtsSingle Bench

Ram Mehar And Another vs Anil Kumar And Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 28 June 2021 · Citation: (2021) 06 P&H CK 0011

HON’BLE JUDGES
Mahabir Singh Sindhu, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Section 166, 173
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
First Appeal Order No. 5027 Of 2010 (O&M)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

46 paragraphs · 855 words

Mahabir Singh Sindhu, J

Present application has been filed for preponement of the date of hearing fixed in CM-76-CII-2021, i.e. 08.09.2021 and for d i s p o s i n g o f f t h e m

a i n a p p e a l i n v i e w o f c o m p r o m i s e a r r i v e d a t b e t w e e n t h e non-applicants/appellants and applicant/respondent No.3- Insurance

Company.

For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed as prayed for subject to all just exceptions. Next date in CM- 76-CII-2021 is

preponed and the same is taken up on board today itself.

CM-76-CII of 2021 Application for fixing actual date of hearing in the main which was admitted on 09.11.2012 and disposing off the same in terms of

compromise arrived at between non-applicants/appellants and applicant/respondent No.3 (Insurance Company).

Learned counsel for the non-applicants-appellants raises no objection.

In view of the above and for the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed; Main appeal is taken up on board today itself.

Main case Present appeal has been filed by the appellants/claimants under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short 'Act') against the

impugned award dated 08.08.2009, passed by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Gurgaon (for short 'Tribunal'), for its

modification/enhancement.

Paper-book reveals that a claim petition under Section 166 of the Act was filed by the appellants/claimants on account of motor- vehicular accident,

which took place on 13.10.2007 at about 12:15 PM in the area of Police Station Manesar, resulting into the death of Sarjit son of Lala Ram,

Dharambir, Annu @ Dharmender and Sanjeev @ Sanju and injuries suffered by them.

Learned Tribunal, after taking into consideration the material available on record, partly allowed the claim petition and awarded a total compensation

of Rs.3,73,000/- to the claimants/appellants along with interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition till its realization.

Respondents were held liable jointly and severally to pay the amount of compensation to the appellants/claimants.

Aggrieved against the above award dated 08.08.2009, present appeal was preferred.

Learned counsel for the appellants contends that matter has been compromised between the parties amicably and the Insurance Company has agreed

to pay a sum of Rs.2,10,000/- over and above the amount, awarded by learned Tribunal, by way of cheque bearing No.046684 dated 17.12.2020 of

ICICI Bank Ltd. in favour of appellant No.1-Ram Mehar. Also contends that there is annexure A-1 with CM- 76-CII-2021 regarding the consent of

both the appellants/ claimants.

This Court has gone through CM-76-CII-2021 and paragrahs-3 to 5 of the same read as under: -

3.

That accordingly, now the parties have entered into a compromise wherein the applicant insurance company has made offer to the claimants

counsel for settlement of case in Rs.2,10,000/- (Rupees Two Lacs Ten Thousand Only) over and above the compensation awarded by the Ld.

Tribunal. The Counsel for the Appellants/ claimants agreed for the said proposal and has given his consent in writing. Copy of the writing executed by

Counsel for the claimants is attached herewith as Annexure A-1.

4.

That as per settlement between the parties applicant-insurance company is agreeing to pay a sum of Rs.2,10,000/- (Rupees Two Lacs Ten

Thousand Only) more to the Appellants over and above the compensation already paid by the insurance company as per the award of the Ld. Tribunal

below in full and final settlement of the award. It is relevant to mention here that the amount awarded by the Ld. Tribunal as per the liability fixed has

already been deposited earlier. Rs.2,10,000/- (Rupees Two Lacs Ten Thousand Only) is being paid over and above the awarded amount in full and

final settlement of the award including interest etc. Copy of DD/Cross Cheque is attached herewith as Annexure A-2.

5.

That as per the compromise, the Applicant- insurance company send the Cheque of Rs.2,10,000/- (Rupees Two Lacs Ten Thousand Only) to the

undersigned for delivery of the same to the Counsel for the Appellants/ claimants.

In view of the extracted portion of the application, reproduced hereinabove, it is apparently clear that the matter has been amicably settled between

the parties and the Insurer has paid an amount of Rs.2.10 Lacs to the appellants over and above the compensation, awarded by learned Tribunal and

that is acceptable to the appellants as full and final settlement.

Even before this Court also, both learned counsel for the parties have stated that they are fully authorized to settle the matter.

Learned counsel for the Insurer has already handed over the aforesaid cheque of Rs.2.10 Lacs to learned counsel for the appellants for its onward

transmission to them. Copy of the cheque, duly received by learned counsel for the appellants, is taken on record.

Consequently, the present appeal is disposed off in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties and they shall be bound by their respective

stand.

Ordered accordingly.

Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed off.