High CourtsSingle Bench

Sehnaz & others vs M/s SRS Real Estate Ltd. & others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 10 September 2018 · Citation: (2018) 09 P&H CK 0043

HON’BLE JUDGES
Tejinder Singh Dhindsa, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Section 166
RESULT
Disposed off
CASE NUMBER
First Appeal form Order No.10581 of 2014 (O&M)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

25 paragraphs · 420 words

Instant application has been filed by the contesting respondent No.3/Insurance Company and the prayer is for disposal of the main appeal in terms of a

compromise i.e. stated to have effected between the appellants/ claimants and the Insurance Company.

Notice in the application.

Mr. Arjun Atri, Advocate representing the claimants/appellants accepts notice. A complete copy of the application was already furnished to the

counsel.

In the light of the prayer made in the application and by recording a no objection from the counsel for the parties, the main appeal which otherwise

was admitted is taken up for final disposal today itself.

Application is disposed of.

This is claimants' appeal seeking enhancement of compensation.

Briefly, it may be noticed that in pursuance to a claim petition filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicle Act, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal,

Nuh has passed an award dated 16.03.2013 and in terms of which a compensation amount of Rs.5,55,500/- along with interest at the rate of 6% per

annum from the date of filing of the claim petition till realization has been awarded in favour of the claimants/appellants on account of death of Juber

in a motor vehicle accident that took place on 10.06.2007.

Counsel representing the contesting respondent No.3/Insurance Company submits that after filing of the instant appeal, a compromise/ settlement has

been arrived at and in terms of which Insurance Company is ready and willing to pay an additional sum of Rs.1 lakh over and above the compensation

amount already awarded by the Tribunal in the award dated 16.03.2013.

Learned counsel representing the claimants/appellants concedes to the factum of such settlement and makes a categoric statement that the appellants

would be satisfied, if additional sum of Rs.1 lakh is awarded to them.

In terms of such consensus arrived at between the parties as also the settlement, the instant appeal is disposed of by directing respondent

No.3/Insurance Company to deposit two demand drafts i.e. a demand draft for an amount of Rs.75,000/- in favour of appellant No.1-Sehnaz i.e.

widow of deceased Juber as also mother and natural guardian of appellant No.2.

The second demand draft would be for an amount of Rs.25,000/- and drawn in the name of appellant No.4 i.e. Jaibun i.e. mother of the deceased.

Both the drafts be deposited within a period of four weeks from today with the branch of Daily Lok Adalat of the High Court to be made over to

appellant No.1, namely, Sehnaz as also appellant No.4.

Appeal is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.