AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
5 paragraphs · 85 wordsRajiv Joshi, Member (J)
1.
List has been revised, nobody appears on behalf of applicant. However, Shri Vijay Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondents is present.
2.
Under the circumstances, the Court has no option, but to dismiss instant case for want of prosecution as per Rule 15 (1) of Central Administrative Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1987. Accordingly, instant Original Application stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
3.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
4.
Pending M.A., if any, will be treated as disposed of.