High CourtsSingle Bench

Rambabu @ Bauwa vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 28 May 2021 · Citation: (2021) 05 CHH CK 0173

HON’BLE JUDGES
Arvind Singh Chandel, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 341, 376, 506 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Protection Of Children From Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — Section 3, 4 · Scheduled Castes And Tribes (Prevention Of Atrocities) Act, 1989 — Section 3(1)(R)(S), 3(2V)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case (MCRC) No. 2628 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

21 paragraphs · 426 words

Arvind Singh Chandel, J

1.

The Applicant has preferred this first bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail as he is arrested in connection with

crime No. 30/2020, registered at Police Station - AJAK, Surajpur, District Surajpur (C.G.), for the offence punishable under Sections 376, 341 & 506

of the Indian Penal Code and 3 & 4 of the POCSO Act and Section 3(1)(R)(S), 3(2-V) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

2.

As per the prosecution story, at the time of alleged incident, prosecutrix was a minor girl. It is alleged that on 13.8.2020, when she was returning

from her house, allegedly, applicant stopped her, gagged her mouth and dragged her to the nearby field and committed forceful sexual intercourse with

her. Matter was reported and on the basis of the said, offence was registered. After completion of the investigation, charge-sheet was filed. Applicant

was arrested on 14.8.2020.

3.

Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the case due to some

previous dispute with the prosecutrix and with her family members. He further submits that applicant is in jail since 14/8/2020 and charge-sheet has

been filed. He further states that prosecutrix as well as her father have been examined before the trial Court and they have not supported the case of

the prosecution and turned hostile. Therefore, it is prayed that applicant may be granted bail.

4.

Per contra, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the State opposes the bail application.

5.

I have heard learned Counsel for the parties, perused the case diary and Court statement of the prosecutrix.

6.

Taking into consideration the submissions put-forth on behalf of the parties, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, evidence collected

by the prosecution and after going through the Court statement of the prosecutrix which is annexed with the petition, where prosecutrix has not

supported the case of the prosecution and turned hostile, and the fact that applicant is in custody since 14/8/2020, charge-sheet has been filed, trial is

likely to take some time, without further commenting on merits of the case, I am inclined to release him on bail.

7.

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.

8.

It is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 20,000/- with one solvent surety for the like

amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court for his appearance before the said Court as and when directed.