High CourtsDivision Bench

Rashid Mohammed vs Himachal Road Transport And Others

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 22 November 2021 · Citation: (2021) 11 SHI CK 0071

HON’BLE JUDGES
Mohammad Rafiq, CJ · Sabina, J
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 7233 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 155 words

Mohammad Rafiq, CJ

1.

The parties are ad idem that the issue in question is no longer res integra in view of the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of this Court in CWP No.3050 of 2014, titled Nek Ram vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others, decided on 17.7.2014.

2.

Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of on the basis of the ratio laid down in the aforesaid judgment.

3.

Consequently, the respondents are directed to pay all retiral benefits to the petitioner within a period of six months from today. However, it is made clear that in case the retiral benefits are not paid to the petitioner within the aforesaid time, then in addition to the due statutory benefits, the petitioner shall also be paid interest at the rate of 9% per annum beyond the period of six months till the date of payment.

4.

Pending application(s), if any also stand(s) disposed of.