AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
19 paragraphs · 433 wordsLearned Public Prosecutor apprises this Court that compliance of Section 15-A (3) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of
Atrocities), 1989 (for short ""the Act of 1989"") has been made.
The present appeal has been filed under Section 14-A (2) of the Act of 1989. The appellant has been arrested in connection with FIR No.245/2020
registered at Police Station Kotwali Bundi District Bundi for the offence (s) under Section(s) 354 of IPC and Sections 7 & 8 of the Protection of
Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012 (for brevity ""the Act of 2012"") and Section 3(1)(w) of the Act of 1989 and later on for the
offences under Sections 363, 366-A & 354 of IPC, Sections 7 & 8 of the Act of 2012 and Sections 3(1)(w) & 3(2)(va) of the Act of 1989.
It is contended by learned counsel for the appellant that he has falsely been implicated in this case. He submitted that during the course of
investigation, it was found that no offence under the Act of 1989 is made out and hence, charge-sheet has been filed under Sections 354, 363, 366-A
of IPC and Section 7/8 of the Act of 2012. Drawing attention of this Court towards the statement of prosecutrix recorded under Section 164 CrPC,
learned counsel for the appellant contended that no offence, as alleged, is made out against him, he is in custody since 23.09.2020, charge-sheet has
been filed, trial of the case will take time, he has no criminal antecedents and prayed for his release on bail.
Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the appeal. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the appellant, the
nature of allegation against him, his length of custody, filing of the charge-sheet and absence of criminal antecedents; but, without expressing any
opinion on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the appellant on bail.
The order dated 03.10.2020 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST (POA) Cases, Bundi is quashed and set-aside and the appeal is accordingly
allowed and it is directed that accused- appellant Ravindra Singh S/o Ajeet Singh shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the
sum of Rs.100,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to the
satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all
subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
