AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
20 paragraphs · 436 wordsThe present criminal appeal under Section 14-A of the Scheduled Case/Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act has been filed in connection
with FIR No.267/2020 registered at Police Station Sodala, District Jaipur City (South) for the offence under Section(s) 376 I.P.C. & under Section(s)
3(1)(w)(ii) & 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and later on for the offence under Section(s)
376 & 328 of I.P.C. and under Section(s) 3(1)(w)(ii) & 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
It is contended by learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant has falsely been implicated in this case. He submitted that there are material
contradictions in the contents of FIR lodged by the prosecutrix herself qua her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. Drawing attention of
this Court towards the statements of the prosecution witnesses namely Nitin Agarwal, Kajal Agarwal and Harishankar Agarwal recorded under
Section 161 Cr.P.C, learned counsel for the appellant contended that the prosecutrix, who is married and aged 35 years, was not subjected to any rape
by the appellant. He submitted that the appellant is in custody since 04.09.2020, charge sheet has already been filed, trial of the case will take time, he
has no criminal antecedents of similar nature and prays for release of the appellant on bail.
Learned Public Prosecutor assisted by the learned counsel for the complainant submitted that there are grave allegations against the appellant of
subjecting the prosecutrix to rape and hence, the appellant does not deserve indulgence of bail.
Heard learned counsels for the parties and perused the record.
Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by learned counsels for the respective parties, the nature of allegations against the appellant, his
length of custody; but, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the appellant on bail.
The order dated 22.10.2020 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities Cases), Jaipur Metropolitan-1 is quashed and set-
aside and this appeal is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused appellant Subhash Sharma S/o Late Shri Babu Lal shall be released on
 bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/-
(Rupees Fivty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any
Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
