AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
10 paragraphs · 171 wordsSUDHANSHU DHULIA, J. (ORAL)
Heard Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate for the applicant and Mr. J.S. Virk, AGA with Ms. Shivali Joshi, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand.
The applicant is in jail having been implicated in FIR No.90 of 2018, which has been registered under Sections 392 and 411 of IPC, at Police Station
Mukhani, District Nainital. The applicant is in jail since 22.06.2018.
Considering the overall evidence which is presently available before this Court and the fact that the applicant has no criminal history, the applicant has
been able to make out a case for bail. The bail application is accordingly allowed.
Let the applicant be enlarged on bail in the aforesaid crime on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each of the equal amount to the
satisfaction of the Magistrate concerned/court concerned.
It is made clear that any observations made by this Court are only for the purposes of grant of bail. It shall not be taken into consideration at all in any
other proceedings.