High CourtsSingle Bench

Ravneet Singh Lamba & Ors vs State & Anr

Delhi High Court · Decided on 11 October 2018 · Citation: (2018) 10 DEL CK 0219

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 406, 498A
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous CaseNo.5218 OF 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

23 paragraphs · 397 words

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J

Crl. M.A. 34088/2018 (Exemption)

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.Â

CRL.M.C. 5218/2018

1.

Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. 103 of 2016 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at Police Station Mianwali Nagar,  Delhi,

based on a settlement. Â

2.

Subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord. Â

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that parties have settled their disputes and settlement agreement/Memo of Understanding dated

20.04.2018 has been executed between the parties. Copy of the same has been produced. The same is taken on record. Parties have amicably

dissolved their marriage by mutual consent and decree of divorce dated 08.06.2018 has been passed.

4.

As per the settlement, a total sum of Rs. 5 lakhs has been agreed to be paid by the petitioners to respondent no. 2 in full and final settlement of all

the claims of respondent no. 2. The entire sum of Rs. 5 lakhs has already been paid to respondent no. 2, who confirms the receipt of the same.Â

5.

The respondent No.2 is present in person, represented by her counsel and is identified by the Investigating Officer. She submits that she has

settled her disputes with the petitioners and does not wish to press charges against the petitioners and prosecute the complaint any further.Â

6.

Both the parties are present in person and submit that they shall abide by the terms of settlement.Â

7.

In view of the fact that the proceedings emanate out of a matrimonial discord and the parties have fully and finally settled their disputes and the

respondent No.2 has stated that she does not wish to press the complaint any further and the fact that the parties have already been divorced by way

of a decree of divorce, passed on 08.06.2018, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that

the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. It would be

expedient to quash the subject FIR and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.

8.

In view of the above, the petition is allowed. FIR No. 103 of 2016 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at Police Station Mianwali

Nagar,  Delhi and the consequent proceedings emanating there from are quashed.Â

9.

Order Dasti under the signatures of the Court Master.Â