High CourtsSingle Bench

Rinzing Chonzom vs State Of Sikkim & Ors.

Sikkim High Court · Decided on 19 November 2024 · Citation: (2024) 11 SIK CK 0012

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 09 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 129 words

Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J

1.

The learned Deputy Solicitor General of India submits that there is no need for respondent no.2 to file counter affidavit. The learned Government Advocate for respondent nos. 1, 3, 5 and 6 submits that they have filed their joint counter affidavit. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will require sometime to file rejoinder.

2.

Mr. Zangpo Sherpa, learned Advocate submits that an additional affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent nos. 4, 7, 8 and 9. The learned counsel for the petitioner desires sometime to examine and file a response, if required.

3.

Four weeks time as prayed for is granted to the petitioner to file rejoinder and the reply if any.

4.

List it after the ensuing winter vacation.