High CourtsSingle Bench

Rinzing Chonzom vs State Of Sikkim & Ors.

Sikkim High Court · Decided on 7 March 2025 · Citation: (2025) 03 SIK CK 0697

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 09 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 116 words

Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J

1.

The report of the Registry dated 22.04.2024 records that although the AD card and unserved notice have not been received back from the respondent no.10, the postal tracking report states that the item was delivered to the addressee. This was recorded in our order dated 24.04.2024 as well. The matter has appeared before the Court on five dates thereafter. The respondent no.10 has not appeared as yet. As a final attempt, the Registry is directed to serve a notice to the Respondent no.10 through the Gangtok District Court Process Server and file its report before the next date. The petitioner shall file the requisites within two days.

2.

List on 01.04.2025.