High CourtsSingle Bench

State Of Sikkim vs Finpanda Technology Private Limited And Ors

Sikkim High Court · Decided on 12 February 2026 · Citation: (2026) 02 SIK CK 1729

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Revision Petition No. 7 Of 2025
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 149 words

Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J

This matter was heard on 08.12.2025 and the next date for orders was on 26.03.2026. However, due to the new calendar, the Registry was directed to pre-pone the matter and it was done for 12.02.2026. The Registry’s report dated 10.02.2026 reflects that neither the AD Card nor the unserved notice has been received by the Registry with regard to notice issued upon the respondents No. 1, 2 and 3. However, postal tracking report reflects that notices have been delivered to the said respondents.

The respondents are not present today.

Mr. Vivek Anand Basnett, learned Counsel, appears and submits that he does not have the vakalatnama but he was engaged prior by the respondents No.1, 2 and 3 and since he noticed that the matter was listed today, he has appeared. In such view of the matter, list on 01.04.2026, to await service upon the respondents.