High CourtsSingle Bench

Roshan Jena Vs State Of Orissa

Orissa High Court · Decided on 10 January 2024 · Citation: (2024) 01 OHC CK 0093

HON’BLE JUDGES
G. Satapathy, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 385, 386 · Arms Act, 1959 — Section 25, 27
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No.14685 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 514 words

G. Satapathy, J

1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode).

2.

This is a bail application U/S.439 of Cr.P.C. by the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Airfield P.S. Case No.259 of 2023 arising out of C.T. Case No.794 of 2023 pending in the file of learned J.M.F.C.(COG-I), Bhubaneswar, for commission of offences punishable under Sections 385/386/34 of IPC read with Sections 25/27 of Arms Act, on the allegation of extracting money from the Truck owners.

3.

Heard, Mr. B.P. Pradhan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. P.K. Mohanty, learned ASC in the present matter and perused the record.

4.

After having considered the rival submissions and taking into consideration the nature and gravity of accusations raised against the petitioner and regard being had to the pre trial detention of the petitioner in custody since 17.10.2023 and on going through the materials placed on record including the offences alleged to be triable by the Magistrate First Class and taking into account the law laid down by the Apex Court in Satendra Kumar Antil Vrs. Central Bureau of Investigation; (2021) 10 SCC 773, this Court admits the petitioner to bail.

5.

Hence, the bail application of the petitioner stands allowed and the petitioner is allowed to go on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) only with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin of the case on such terms and conditions as deem fit and proper by it with following conditions:-

(i) the petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail,

(ii) the petitioner shall attend the trial Court on each date of posting without fail unless his attendance is dispensed with. In case the Petitioner fails without sufficient cause to appear in the Court in accordance with the terms of the bail, the learned trial Court may proceed against the Petitioner for offence U/S.229-A of IPC in accordance with law,

(iii) the petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the trial Court without prior permission till disposal of the case and

(iv) the petitioner shall report attendance before the Jurisdictional Police Station once in a fortnight preferably on second Sunday of each month in between 10 A.M. to 12 Noon for six(06) months from the actual date of release from the custody.

The I.I.C. of Jurisdictional Police Station shall not detain the petitioner unnecessarily after recording his attendance beyond the time as stipulated.

It is clarified that the Court in seisin of the case will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner without further reference to this Court, if any of the above conditions are violated or a case for cancellation of bail is otherwise made out. In the wake of aforesaid, the subsequent involvement of the petitioner in future for similar offences on prima facie accusations may be treated as a ground for cancellation of bail in this case.

6.

Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of.

7.

Issue urgent certified copy of the order as per Rules.

…………………………………