High CourtsSingle Bench

Saddam Husain vs State Of Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 23 November 2020 · Citation: (2020) 11 RAJ CK 0073

HON’BLE JUDGES
Mahendar Kumar Goyal, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 307, 323, 324, 326, 341 · Arms Act, 1959 — Section 4, 25
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13457 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 235 words
1.

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.235/2020

registered at Police Station Dablana, District Bundi for the offence(s) under Section(s) 341, 323, 307 & 34 of IPC and later on for the offences under

Sections 341, 323, 324, 326 & 307 of IPC and Section 4/25 of the Arms Act.

2.

It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He submitted that the petitioner is in

judicial custody, charge-sheet has been filed, trial of the case will take time, he has no criminal antecedents and prays for his release on bail.

3.

Learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for the complainant opposing the bail application submitted that there is specific allegation

against the petitioner of inflicting stab wound injury on vital part of body of Fazlu which as per the medical opinion has been found to be dangerous to

life and therefore the petitioner does not deserve indulgence of bail.

4.

Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by learned counsels for the respective parties, the nature and gravity of the allegations against

the petitioner and the material available in the charge-sheet; but, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge

the petitioner on bail.

5.

The bail application is rejected accordingly.