High CourtsSingle Bench

Sajjan Singh vs State of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 25 August 2018 · Citation: (2018) 08 P&H CK 0279

HON’BLE JUDGES
SURINDER GUPTA, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 437(3), 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 302
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No.-18938 Of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

21 paragraphs · 383 words

The present petition has been filed under Section 439 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.13 dated

14.03.2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302/34 of Indian Penal Code (for short, “IPCâ€) and 25/27 of the Arms Act, at

Police Station Bhaini Mian Khan, District Grudaspur.

Heard.

As per case of prosecution, father of complainant was caught hold by petitioner and his co-accused, namely, Sumeet Singh (since proclaimed

offender) and at the lalkara of Sumeet Singh, Surjit Singh (since deceased) fired shot at father of complainant, which hit on his neck. On being taken

to hospital, he was declared dead.

Learned State counsel submits that challan has been presented and charges have also been framed against the petitioner. He submits that main

accused Surjit Singh has already died while co-accused, namely, Sumeet Singh is proclaimed offender. Petitioner has been falsely implicated in this

case due to political rivalry. The prosecution version that petitioner alongwith Sumeet Singh had caught hold of deceased, who was fired from a

distance by Surjit Singh is improbable on the face of it as nobody will take risk of being fired towards him.

Petitioner was not armed at the time of occurrence. Probability of prosecution version will be subject of judicial scrutiny during trial which call for no

comments at this stage. However, keeping in view the period of incarceration of petitioner; that conclusion of trial will take time and that main

witnesses have already been examined, but without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the present petition is allowed. Petitioner-Sajjan

Singh is ordered to be released on regular bail on furnishing bail bond and surety bond to the satisfaction of concerned trial Court/Chief Judicial

Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, subject to following terms:-

(a) The petitioner shall comply with the conditions mentioned in Section 437(3) Cr.P.C.

(b) In the event of his absence on any date of hearing, the benefit of bail allowed to the petitioner shall stand withdrawn. The trial Court shall be

competent to cancel his bail bond and surety bond and proceed to procure his presence in accordance with law. In that eventuality the petitioner shall

have to apply for bail afresh.

(c) He shall not leave the country without the previous permission of the Court.