High CourtsSingle Bench

Sanal vs State Of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 14 May 2024 · Citation: (2024) 05 KL CK 0041

HON’BLE JUDGES
Mohammed Nias C.P., J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 22(b)
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No.3591 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 437 words

Mohammed Nias C.P., J

1.

This is an application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking regular bail.

2.

The petitioner is the sole accused in Crime No. 273/2024 of Eloor Police Station, Ernakulam, for having committed an offence punishable under Section 22(b) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (for short 'The NDPS Act').

3.

The prosecution case, in brief, is that, on 30.3.2024 at about 00.15 hours, while the police party was on patrolling duty when they reached near in front of a scrap shop owned by one Mr Subair situated on the Eastern side of Nelson Mandela Road which lying from East North direction of Pathalam Road, the accused spotted with a scooter bearing Reg.No. KL.41.T.7235. On suspicion, the police party searched and seized 8.25 grams of MDMA alleged to have been kept in a small ziplock cover. The petitioner was arrested on 30.3.2024 and remanded to judicial custody.

4.

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would say that the petitioner is totally innocent and has been falsely implicated with ulterior motives. At any rate, he points out that the petitioner has been in custody since 30.3.2024, and the continued custody of the petitioner is unnecessary.

5.

The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the petition.

6.

After having considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and taking note of the fact that intermediate quantity is involved and the fact that the petitioner has been in custody from 30.3.2024 and no other criminal antecedents have been reported against the petitioner and also, since there is no apprehension raised by the prosecution that if released on bail the petitioner is likely to abscond, I hold that bail can be granted to the petitioner. I am inclined to grant bail under such circumstances.

7.

Accordingly, this application is allowed, and the petitioner is granted bail subject to the following conditions:-

i. The petitioner shall be released on bail on executing a bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court;

ii. The petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer every Saturday between 9 a.m. and 10 a.m. till the final report is laid;

iii.The petitioner shall not tamper or attempt to tamper with the evidence or influence or try to influence the witnesses;

iv.The petitioner shall not be involved in any other crime while on bail.

v. If any of the above conditions are violated, the court concerned will be empowered to take steps for cancellation of bail as per law.