AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
7 paragraphs · 250 wordsManoj Kumar Garg, J
The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.27/2023, Police Station Pilibanga, Distt. Hanumangarh for the offence under Section 363 of IPC.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the statement of the prosecutrix, a specific averment has been made that co-accused Surya Prakash had committed rape with her. There is no specific allegation against the petitioner. Challan of the case has already been presented and no investigation is pending. The petitioner is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time. Therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioner.
Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.
I have considered the arguments advanced before me and gone through the material available on record.
Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail.
Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Sandeep S/o Subhash Chandra shall be enlarged on bail in FIR No.27/2023, Police Station Pilibanga, Distt. Hanumangarh provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.