AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
7 paragraphs · 254 wordsManoj Kumar Garg, J
The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.141/2022, Police Station Bagdi Nagar, District Pali for the offence punishable under Sections 363, 366, 120-B of the IPC.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that according to the statement of prosecutrix recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., she clearly mentioned that the petitioner has not committed rape with her and he has only left her at the house of the co-accused. The petitioner is in the judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.
Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the prayer for bail.
I have considered the arguments advanced before me and gone through the material available on record.
Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail.
Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner, Sattu @ Satya Prakash S/o Govind Ram, shall be enlarged on bail in F.I.R. No.141/2022, Police Station Bagdi Nagar, District Pali provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.