High CourtsSingle Bench

Sarita Kesarwani vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 22 April 2024 · Citation: (2024) 04 UK CK 0127

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravindra Maithani, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 120B, 409, 420 · Uttarakhand Protection Of Interest Of Depositors (In Financial Establishment) Act, 2005 — Section 03
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 2396 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 152 words

Ravindra Maithani, J

1.

Applicant Sarita Kesarwani is in judicial custody in Case Crime No.29 of 2021, under Sections 409, 420 and 120-B IPC and Section 03 of the Uttarakhand Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Financial Establishment) Act, 2005, Police Station-Karanprayag, District- Chamoli. She has sought her release on bail.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3.

Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that co-accused, having similar role, have already been granted bail.

4.

This fact is admitted by learned State Counsel.

5.

Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.

6.

The bail application is allowed.

7.

Let the applicant be released on bail, on her executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.