Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench

Sarju Prasad vs Union Of India & Ors

Central Administrative Tribunal · Decided on 22 November 2022 · Citation: (2022) 11 CAT CK 0053

HON’BLE JUDGES
Om Prakash VII, Member (J)
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Original Application No. 330, 01067 Of 2018

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 98 words

Om Prakash VII, Member (J)

1.

Shri Manish Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri R.K. Srivastava holding brief of Shri S.P. Pathak, learned counsel for the respondents are present.

2.

Learned counsel for the respondents states that as per Misc. Application No.215 of 2022 moved on behalf of the respondents the grievance of the applicant has been redressed. Thus, the present OA has become infructuous.

3.

Learned counsel for the applicant did not oppose the submission raised on behalf of the respondents’ counsel.

4.

Accordingly, the O.A. is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs.