High CourtsSingle Bench

Sewak Singh vs State Of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 11 December 2020 · Citation: (2020) 12 P&H CK 0209

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manjari Nehru Kaul, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Narcotic Drugs And Psychotroic Substantes Act, 1985 — Section 15, 18
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 40968 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

17 paragraphs · 296 words

Manjari Nehru Kaul, J

Instant petition has been filed under Section 439 Cr.PC for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.58 dated 11.06.2020 registered under

Sections 15/18 of NDPS Act 1985 at Police Station Baghapurana District Moga.

Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the FIR in question. He submits that he had

merely taken a lift in the vehicle of co-accused Amritpal Singh. Thereafter during a routine naka conducted by the police, the alleged recovery of 100

kg of poppy husk from the car and 22 gms of opium from the person of co-accused Amritpal Singh was effected. It has been submitted that it is thus

evident that the petitioner had no role whatsoever in the transportation of the alleged contraband and he had been implicated in the case in hand only

because he was travelling in the aforesaid vehicle. He also contends that since there were two persons travelling in the vehicle, hence, the alleged

recovery shall have to be divided amongst the two passengers which would come to 50 kg poppy husk each. Hence, he prays for concession of

regular bail to the petitioner.

Per contra, learned State counsel while opposing the prayer of learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner was earlier also

involved in another case under NDPS Act. However, the petitioner earned an acquittal in the aforesaid case on account of certain lapses by the police

officials for which the concerned officials were issued show cause notice as well.

Heard.

In view of the huge recovery of contraband from the petitioner, which admittedly falls within the commercial quantity, the petitioner does not deserve

the concession of regular bail.

Accordingly, the present petition stands dismissed.