High CourtsSingle Bench

Shahnoor vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 11 February 2022 · Citation: (2022) 02 UK CK 0025

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravindra Maithani, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 379, 411
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 274 Of 2022
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 199 words

Ravindra Maithani, J

1.

Applicant Shahnoor is in judicial custody in Case Crime No. 743 of 2021, under Sections 379, 411 IPC, Police Station Kotwali Jawalapur, District

Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing and perused the record.

3.

According to the FIR, a rickshaw was stolen on 27.12.2021, which was subsequently recovered from the possession of the applicant.

4.

It is argued that there is no independent witness of the alleged recovery; same day recovery has been shown and the applicant is not a previous

convict.

5.

State counsel admits that there is no previous conviction recorded in the name of the applicant.

6 Having considered all these facts, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.

7.

The bail application is allowed.

8.

Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the

satisfaction of the court concerned.

9.

This bail order be forwarded to concerned court as well as the concerned jail through e-mail also.