High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 04 DEL CK 0046

SHASHWAT & ANR; RANBIR SINGH; MAHABIR SINGH; SUMIT KUMAR DAHIYA vs STATE NCT OF DELHI

Delhi High Court · Decided on 10 April 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
BAIL APPLN.--871 of 2017

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

21 paragraphs · 314 words

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)

1.The Petitioners seek anticipatory bail in FIR No.138/2017 under Sections 323/341/506/34/308 IPC, Police Station Hauz Khas.

2.Subject FIR was registered consequent to a quarrel between the parties over their children. Cross-FIR being FIR No.140/2017 under Sections

323/341/506/34 IPC has also been registered against the complainants in the subject FIR.

3.Learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties have settled their disputes where under it has been agreed that the petitioners shall pay a

sum of Rs.1 lakh to the complainants in the subject FIR within a period of two weeks.Â

4.Though the parties have reconciled their disputes, they have agreed that the petitioners will tender their apology to the complainants before the

respectable elder members of the Society, who have mediated between the parties, because of which, settlement between the parties have been

arrived at.

5.It has been agreed that both the parties shall respectively initiate appropriate proceedings for quashing of FIR No.138/2017 and compounding of the

offences/quashing in FIR No.140/2017.Â

6.Petitioners in Bail Application No.871/2017 were granted interim protection on 11.05.2017. Petitioners in Bail Application No.942/2017 were granted

interim protection on 19.05.2017. Petitioners in Bail Application No.979/2017 were granted interim protection on 25.05.2017 and Petitioners in Bail

Application No.982/2017 were granted interim protection on 25.05.2017.Â

7.The Investigating Officer submits that the petitioners joined investigation, as and when were called upon to do so.

8.Since the parties have settled their disputes and petitioners have complied with the orders granting interim protection, I am of the view that the

petitioners have made out the case for grant of anticipatory bail. Â

9.In the event of arrest, the Arresting Officer shall release the petitioners on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- by each of

the petitioners.  Â

10.The Petitions are disposed of in the above terms.

11.Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master. Â