High CourtsSingle Bench

Shubham Verma And Ors vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 10 May 2021 · Citation: (2021) 05 CHH CK 0058

HON’BLE JUDGES
NK Chandravanshi, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 294, 323, 324, 341, 394, 506 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 164, 438
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Misc. Criminal Case (A) No. 1706 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

25 paragraphs · 466 words

N.K. Chandravanshi, J

1.

The applicants have preferred this bail application under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail as they apprehend their arrest in

connection with Crime No.428/2019, registered at Police Station Kotwali Ambikapur (CG) for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 294, 323,

324, 506, 394, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

2.

As per the case of the prosecution story, the complainant lodged a report in Police Station Kotwali Ambikapur to the effect that applicants and

other persons stopped him and his friend Pramod Yadav near Mathpara turn, and starting beating them and assaulted on him and Pramod with a

broken liquor bottle and looted Rs. 3,000/- from him and Rs. 500/- and Mobile from Pramod, also broke the mobile. On the basis of written report

F.I.R. was registered.

3.

Counsel for the applicants submitted that the applicants are innocent and falsely implicated in the crime. He further submitted that it is a simple case

of Marpeet and no loot has been committed in the case which they have accepted in their statement under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. recorded in the

Court. Therefore, the applicants may be granted anticipatory bail.

4.

On the contrary, learned State counsel opposes the application for grant of anticipatory bail.

5.

Considering the facts and circumstances particularly as per the submission that complainants have accepted in their statement recorded under

Section 164 of Cr.P.C. that no loot has been committed in the matter and as no criminal antecedents of the applicant has been shown in the case

diary, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the applicants.

6.

Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of the applicants in connection with the aforesaid

offence, they shall be released on bail by the officer arresting on each of them executing a personal bond in a sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in

the like sum to the satisfaction of the officer arresting them or the concerned investigating officer. The applicants shall also abide by the following

conditions:-

(i) that they shall make himself available for interrogation before the investigating officer as and when required;

(ii) that they shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to

dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer.

(iii) that they shall not act in any manner which will be prejudicial to fair and expeditious trial; and

(iv) that they shall appear before the trial Court on each and every date given to them by the said Court till disposal of the trial;

(v) that in case of change of address they will inform new address to investigating agency.