High CourtsDivision Bench

SIDCUL Solution Network & Others vs State Of Uttarakhand & Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 29 July 2024 · Citation: (2024) 07 UK CK 0124

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ritu Bahri, CJ · Rakesh Thapliyal, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (M/B) No. 249, 251 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 99 words

Ritu Bahri, CJ

1) Counsel for the respondent Nagar Panchayat, Nanakmatta, District Udham Singh Nagar states that after the order dated 04.07.2024, the process for opening the bid was initiated. However, there are only five persons who had participated, out of which three were disqualified, and two were qualified, and as per norms, minimum three should have been qualified, and in this backdrop, respondents have proposed to cancel the tender process.

2) In view of the above, both the writ petitions stands disposed of as infructuous.

3) Pending application(s), if any, in both the petitions also stand disposed of.