Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench

Siti Network Ltd vs Mogu Cable Tv Network & Anr

Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 17 February 2023 · Citation: (2023) 02 TDSAT CK 0029

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ram Krishna Gautam, Member
CASE NUMBER
Broadcasting Petition Nos. 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 Of 2017
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 116 words

Except in BP No. 14 of 2017, wherein learned Counsel for Respondent No.2 is present, none is for Respondent No. 1 and Respondent No.2, in rest of cases. The same is the situation since previous dates. It is being said to be deliberate. A request is there for issuing notice through Police mode for Respondent No.1 and Respondent No.2.

Let steps by way of filing police details etc. by way of affidavit, be taken by Petitioner within two weeks. After such steps, let notice be issued through Police mode to Respondent No.1 and Respondent No.2, except in BP No. 14 of 2017 for respondent no. 2,  by office.

List the the matter 'for directions' on 20.04.2023.