AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
6 paragraphs · 149 wordsThese matters were listed today for framing of issues. Mr. Himanshu Lilani, Advocate appears for Petitioner.  Mr. Nasir Husain, Mr. Aditya
Krishna and Ms. Sakshi Chamoli, Advocates appear for R-2 in B.P. No. 221/2018, 242/2018 and 234 to 237/2018 respectively.  No one
appears for R-1 and R-2 in B.P. Nos. 222, 223 and 227/2018. Mr. Himanshu, Advocate for petitioner prays for imposition of suitable cost upon R-1
in B.P. No. 227/2018 stating that on last occasion Mr. Nittin Bhatia, Advocate has made incorrect statement that he has not received the copy of the
rejoinder affidavit although the said affidavit was provided to him by electronic means. When this prayer was made on last occasion it was deemed
fit to consider it in the presence of Mr. Bhatia.   Today Mr. Nittin Bhatia is not present.   List on 15th March, 2021 for framing of issues.