High CourtsSingle Bench(2015) 03 KL CK 0196

Sivaranjini S. Narayanan vs State of Kerala and Others

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 12 March 2015 · Citation: (2015) 2 ILR Ker 656

HON’BLE JUDGES
A. Muhamed Mustaque, J
RESULT
Disposed off
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 4287 of 2015

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 250 words

A. Muhamed Mustaque, J.

1.

The petitioner is a minor represented through her father. Petitioner is a 9th standard student in G.H.S.S., Mathil, Payyanur. The petitioner wants to correct her name in the school records. She made a representation in that regard to the 2nd respondent--the Joint Commissioner. Her request has been considered by the 2nd respondent vide Ext. P-11 and the petitioner has been directed to move the Headmaster/Headmistress of the school after gazette notification. The petitioner submits that her request also has been declined by the 4th respondent-Headmistress. The petitioner approached this Court aggrieved by Ext. P-11 direction.

2.

As per the Circular issued by the Commissioner of Government Examination dated 22-9-2012 based on the Government Order No. 323 dated 16-2-2012, the authority to correct the school records of the student from 1st standard to 10th standard who are on the roll, is Headmaster/Headmistress. The circular prescribes the method in which such application has to be filed.

3.

Therefore, I am of the view that the petitioner has to approach the 4th respondent and has to remit necessary fee for the same. The petitioner shall make a request in the prescribed format in accordance with the circular referred as above. If the petitioner makes such a request before the 4th respondent-Headmistress, necessary action shall be taken to correct the school records in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks thereafter.

The writ petition is disposed of with the above directions.

*A reproduction from ILR (Kerala Series)