AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
20 paragraphs · 391 wordsThe matter has been heard via video conferencing due to circumstances prevailing on account of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Heard Mr. Surendra Kishore Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Kumar Virendra Narayan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor
(hereinafter referred to as the ‘APP’) for the State.
The petitioner is in custody in connection with Ahiyapur PS Case No. 136 of 2020 dated 05.02.2020, instituted under Sections 272, 273/34 of the
Indian Penal Code and 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
The allegation against the petitioner is that from his house 72 litres of foreign liquor was recovered.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in the FIR itself, a detailed chain has been shown as to how the police finally landed up at the
petitioner’s house from one accused to the other leading to such recovery from the house of the petitioner. Learned counsel submitted that the
petitioner having no other criminal antecedent is in custody since 13.06.2020.
Learned APP submitted that the recovery has been from the house of the petitioner which clearly indicates that he was also indulging in such illegal
trade.
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail
upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special
Judge, Excise, Muzaffarpur in Ahiyapur PS Case No. 136 of 2020 subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the
petitioner, (ii) that the petitioner and the bailors shall execute bond with regard to good behaviour of the petitioner, and (iii) that the petitioner shall also
give an undertaking to the Court that he shall not indulge in any criminal activity, tamper with the evidence or influence the witnesses. Any violation of
the terms and conditions of the bonds or the undertaking shall lead to cancellation of his bail bonds. The petitioner shall cooperate in the case and be
present before the Court on each and every date. Failure to cooperate or being absent on two consecutive dates, without sufficient cause, shall also
lead to cancellation of his bail bonds.
The application stands disposed off in the aforementioned terms.
