Supreme CourtDivision Bench(2009) 01 SC CK 0091

State of Madhya Pradesh vs Bharat

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 16 January 2009 · Citation: (2010) 1 OLR 296 : (2009) 1 SCALE 464 : (2009) 2 SCC 666

HON’BLE JUDGES
Tarun Chatterjee, J · H. L. Dattu, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Appeal No. 80 of 2009 (Arising out of SLP (Criminal) No. 2522 of 2007)

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 185 words
1.

Leave granted.

2.

A limited notice was issued by this Court on 9th of May, 2008, which runs as under:

Issue notice.

Notice to state as to why cryptic order passed by the High Court should not be set aside by remitting the matter to the High Court to be decided in accordance with law.

3.

After notice, Ms. K. Sarada Devi entered appearance and has appeared before us also. We have heard the learned Counsel for the parties and also examined the impugned order of the High Court and also the limited notice issued by this Court. We are of the view that the impugned order of the High Court may be set aside and the matter may be remitted back to the High Court to decide Misc. Crl. Case No. 1553/2006 on merits in accordance with law afresh within a period of two months from the date of production of a copy of this order to the High Court.

4.

Accordingly, the impugned order of the High Court is set aside. The appeal is thus allowed with no order as to costs.