High CourtsSingle Bench

State Of Meghalaya vs Gopal Krishan Gour

Meghalaya High Court · Decided on 24 March 2025 · Citation: (2025) 03 MEG CK 0636

HON’BLE JUDGES
W. Diengdoh, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 14 Of 2025
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 95 words

W. Diengdoh, J

Ms. S. Ain, learned GA appearing for the State respondent has submitted that the petitioner has tried to affect notice upon the respondent but the same proved futile as he could not be located in the given address.

It is therefore, prayed that some more time may be given for the said notice to be affected, after the petitioner has ascertained the correct address and location of the respondent herein.

Accordingly, as prayed for, let fresh steps be issued upon the respondent, the same returnable within 2(two) weeks.

List the matter thereafter.