High CourtsDIVISION BENCH(2017) 07 RAJ CK 0001

State of Rajasthan vs Anaturam S/o Shri Jaskaran Sharma

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 4 July 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Govind Mathur, Vinit Kumar Mathur
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
46 of 2016

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

25 paragraphs · 247 words
1.

This appeal is barred by limitation from 233 days. An

application is preferred to have condonation of delay in filing the

appeal.

2.

From perusal of the facts stated in the application, it reveals

that the writ petition was accepted by learned Single Bench on

12.03.2015 and a copy of the judgment impugned was obtained

on 17.03.2015. Matter then was forwarded to the competent

authority to have opinion and a decision to file appeal was taken

on 24.11.2015. The appeal then was presented on 04.01.2016. No

reason is given that why the delay occurred even after having a

decision to file appeal.

3.

Pertinent to notice that even after having decision to file

appeal, the appeal was presented after a lapse of more than 60

days which is a period of limitation prescribed to file a special

appeal.

4.

In entirety, we are not at all satisfied with the reasons given

in the application to have condonation of delay. It is well settled

that a party seeking condonation of delay in agitating its cause is

required to satisfy delay on day to day basis. In the instant

matter, what to talk of submission of explanation on day to day

basis, no reason is given for causing delay of months together.

5.

It is relevant to notice that an appeal of similar nature too

has been dismissed by this court by the order dated 06.05.2016

on the count of delay. The instant appeal is also dismissed

accordingly.