High CourtsDivision Bench(2020) 11 CAL CK 0006

Subrata Mondal vs State Of West Bengal & Ors

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 25 November 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, CJ · Arijit Banerjee, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
WPA 2258 Of 2020

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

16 paragraphs · 313 words

       Â

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Pleader for the State.

The short grievance of the petitioner in this public interest litigation is that illegal encroachments are being made on both sides of the Moubesia

highway causing hazard to free movement and also polluting environment. Representations have been made by the petitioner to the Executive

Engineer, PWD (Road), Howrah Highway Division, being the fourth respondent herein. The petitioner submits that no action has been taken on the

basis of his complaint.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and the material on record, we direct the fourth respondent to look into the petitioner’s

grievance as reflected in the writ petition and take appropriate steps in the matter so that any illegal construction or encroachment on the aforesaid

highway may be removed. Before taking any action in the matter, the fourth respondent shall give an opportunity of hearing to any person who may be

adversely affected by his proposed action. For this purpose, the fourth respondent will be entitled to conduct requisite enquiry and the local police will

extend all cooperation and assistance to him.

Let this exercise be completed within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order along with a copy of the writ petition by the fourth

respondent. The petitioner shall ensure service of a copy of this order and a copy of the writ petition on the fourth respondent. If the fourth respondent

finds the allegations in the writ petition to be correct, then necessary consequential steps and remedial measures shall be taken by him at the earliest.

With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of.

Since we have not called for any affidavit, the allegations contained in the writ petition are deemed not to be admitted by the respondents.