AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
17 paragraphs · 330 wordsAugustine George Masih, J
Prayer in this second petition is for grant of regular bail in case FIR No. 54 dated 31.05.2020 under Section 22 of the NDPS Act, 1985, Police Station
Baghapurana, District Moga.
It is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the recovery, which has been effected from the petitioner, is of 400 tablets of Etizolam
and 1000 tablets of Tramadol which comes out to be 403 gms. He contends that the petitioner is in custody since 31.05.2020.
Counsel for the State has informed the Court that the charge has been framed on 05.01.2021 and no witness has been examined till date out of total
13 witnesses.
Counsel for the petitioner asserts that this Court has been granting bail to the accused where the recovery was at times up to 2 Kg and the custody
period was almost 1 year and 2 months. Keeping the principle of the proportionality, he asserts that the petitioner be granted the concession of regular
bail especially in the light of the fact that there is no other case against the petitioner except for the present one.
Counsel for the State could not dispute the said fact as according to the custody certificate also, there is no other case against the petitioner except for
the present one.
Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the recovery, which has been effected from the
petitioner and the period spent by the petitioner in custody as also the order dated 09.10.2020 passed by a Co-ordinate Bench in CRM-M-714 of 2020
titled as Baljeet Singh vs. State of Punjab (Annexure P-4) and he has no other case against the petitioner, the present petition is allowed. Petitioner is
directed to be released on regular bail on furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Duty Magistrate/Chief Judicial Magistrate, Moga.
Any observations made herein above shall have no bearing on the merits of the case.
