High CourtsSingle Bench

Sukhjinder Singh @ Happy vs State Of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 18 January 2021 · Citation: (2021) 01 P&H CK 0198

HON’BLE JUDGES
Augustine George Masih, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Narcotic Drugs And Psychotroic Substantes Act, 1985 — Section 22
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 1235 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

17 paragraphs · 330 words

Augustine George Masih, J

Prayer in this second petition is for grant of regular bail in case FIR No. 54 dated 31.05.2020 under Section 22 of the NDPS Act, 1985, Police Station

Baghapurana, District Moga.

It is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the recovery, which has been effected from the petitioner, is of 400 tablets of Etizolam

and 1000 tablets of Tramadol which comes out to be 403 gms. He contends that the petitioner is in custody since 31.05.2020.

Counsel for the State has informed the Court that the charge has been framed on 05.01.2021 and no witness has been examined till date out of total

13 witnesses.

Counsel for the petitioner asserts that this Court has been granting bail to the accused where the recovery was at times up to 2 Kg and the custody

period was almost 1 year and 2 months. Keeping the principle of the proportionality, he asserts that the petitioner be granted the concession of regular

bail especially in the light of the fact that there is no other case against the petitioner except for the present one.

Counsel for the State could not dispute the said fact as according to the custody certificate also, there is no other case against the petitioner except for

the present one.

Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the recovery, which has been effected from the

petitioner and the period spent by the petitioner in custody as also the order dated 09.10.2020 passed by a Co-ordinate Bench in CRM-M-714 of 2020

titled as Baljeet Singh vs. State of Punjab (Annexure P-4) and he has no other case against the petitioner, the present petition is allowed. Petitioner is

directed to be released on regular bail on furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Duty Magistrate/Chief Judicial Magistrate, Moga.

Any observations made herein above shall have no bearing on the merits of the case.