High CourtsDivision Bench

Suman Kapoor vs State Of H.P. And Another

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 18 June 2021 · Citation: (2021) 06 SHI CK 0053

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sureshwar Thakur, J · Sandeep Sharma, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 3383 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 169 words

Sandeep Sharma, J

1.

Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner states that his client shall be content and satisfied if a direction is issued to the respondents to decide

his pending representation (Annexure P-1), wherein he has prayed for cancellation of his transfer, ordered vide Annexure P-5.

2.

Learned Senior Additional Advocate General is not averse to the aforesaid innocuous prayer made on behalf of the petitioner.

3.

Consequently, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 to consider and decide Annexure P- 1, expeditiously, preferably

within four weeks. Needless to say, authority concerned, while doing the needful, shall afford opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and shall pass a

speaking order thereafter. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings before appropriate court of law, if he still remains

aggrieved. However, till the time, representation of the petitioner is decided, Annexure P-5, shall remain stayed qua the petitioner.

Petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms, alongwith all pending applications.

Copy Dasti.