High CourtsSingle Bench

Suraj Chauhan vs State of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 14 August 2018 · Citation: (2018) 08 UK CK 0080

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sudhanshu Dhulia, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 120B, 379, 411
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No.1434 of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 187 words

SUDHANSHU DHULIA, J. (ORAL)

Heard Mr. Pawan Mishra, Advocate for the applicant and Mr. J.S. Virk, AGA for the State.

The applicant is in jail having been implicated in Case Crime No. 284 of 2018, which has been registered under Sections 379/411 and 120-B of IPC, at

Police Station Kotwali, District Dehradun.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is in jail since 16.06.2018 and the applicant is 19 years of age.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the applicant is 19 years of age, prima facie, the applicant has been able to

make out a case for bail at this stage. The bail application is allowed accordingly.

Let the applicant be enlarged on bail in the aforesaid crime on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each in the like amount to the

satisfaction of the Magistrate concerned/Court concerned.

It is made clear that any observation made by this Court is only for the purpose of deciding the present bail application and the same shall not be taken

into consideration at all in any other proceedings.