High CourtsDivision Bench

Surendra Yadav vs State Of Bihar And Ors

Patna High Court · Decided on 30 September 2020 · Citation: (2020) 09 PAT CK 0388

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjay Karol, CJ · S. Kumar, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 290, 506 · Arms Act, 1959 — Section 25(1b)a, 35 · Bihar Prohibition And Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 — Section 37(1)(Z) · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 451
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 8144 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

17 paragraphs · 314 words

Heard the parties.

Petitioner has prayed for following relief:-

“That present writ application is being filed with a prayer to issuance of appropriate writ in nature of mandamus or any appropriate writ and order

and direction to direct the respondent authorities to release the Honda Yuga motorcycle in black colour, bearing Registration No. BR45L3215, Chasis

No. ME4JC58FEKG010222 and Engine No. JC58EG0008967, belonging to the petitioner, which has been seized in connection with Chand P.S. Case

No. 206/2020, pending in the court of A.D.J-5th-cum-Special Judge (Excise), Kaimur at Bhabua, instituted under section 290, 506 of the Indian Penal

Code and Section 25(1-b)a/35 Arms Act and 37 (1)(Z) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment ) Act, 2018. â€​

Allegation is recovery of country made arms from the possession of the accused persons and they were found in a drunken condition, who were

caught by the villagers and handed over to the police with motorcycle and thereafter accused were arrested and motorcycle was seized.

As there is no allegation of recovery of any illicit liquor from the possession of accused or from the seized motorcycle and allegation is that they were

carrying arms in a drunken condition as such seized motorcycle is not liable for confiscation under Section 56 of the Excise Act and bar of jurisdiction

in confiscation under Section 60 of the Act is not applicable and the Special Court (Excise) where the excise case is pending has jurisdiction to pass

order for release of the seized motorcycle.

Petitioner claims to be owner of the seized motorcycle and is granted liberty to file application under section 451 of Cr. P.C. for release of his seized

motorcycle and the Special Court where the excise case is pending shall dispose of such application for release of motorcycle within 30 days from the

date of its filing.

With aforesaid observation and liberty, writ petition is disposed of.