High CourtsSingle Bench

Suresh Kumar Mittal vs Union Of India & Anr

Sikkim High Court · Decided on 30 March 2026 · Citation: (2026) 03 SIK CK 1285

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 04 Of 2026
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 121 words

Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J

1.

The learned Deputy Solicitor General of India appearing for respondent no.1 submits that although they desire to file a counter affidavit in the present matter, as the documents are voluminous and some of the records maintained by them are illegible, they are in the process of typing them. She therefore, seeks two weeks’ time to file the same. Time prayed for is granted. Two weeks thereafter, to the petitioner to file rejoinder, if so required.

2.

Respondent no.2 may also file a counter affidavit, if so desired, within the same period granted to respondent no.1.

3.

As agreed by the learned counsel for the parties, list I.A. No. 01/2026 along with the writ petition on 04.05.2026.