Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench

Taj Television (india) Pvt. Ltd vs Digicable Network India Pvt Ltd

Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 8 January 2024 · Citation: (2024) 01 TDSAT CK 0005

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ram Krishna Gautam, Member
CASE NUMBER
Broadcasting Petition No. 309, 332 Of 2013 With Misc Application No. 32 Of 2014, 311, 312 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 134 words
1.

Case taken up. Learned Counsel for both side are connected.

2.

It was mentioned by Learned Counsel for Respondent that Resolution Plan of Respondent Company, has been approved and acted upon by order of NCLT dated 12.01.2023. In view of settled proposition of law of Hon'ble Apex Court, the claim of Petitioner stands distinct for which Miscellaneous Applications have  been moved in these two Petitions, scheduled at Item Nos. 1 and 2 on today.

3.

Learned Counsel appearing for Petitioner in these two Petitions mentioned that it requires ten days' time for filing an objection over these applications and seeking instructions from her client. A request for physical hearing mode day, for disposal of these applications, is being made.

4.

List the matter 'for hearing' on 31.01.2024 'for disposal of these miscellaneous applications'.