Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench

Tata Communications Limited vs Broadband Pacenet India Pvt Ltd

Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 20 May 2024 · Citation: (2024) 05 TDSAT CK 0055

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dhirubhai Naranbhai Patel, Chairperson · Subodh Kumar Gupta, Member
CASE NUMBER
Telecom Petition No. 66 Of 2019
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 105 words
1.

When the matter is called out, nobody appeared on behalf of petitioner.

2.

Hence, with a view to give one more chance to the petitioner, this matter is adjourned.

3.

Counsel for the respondent is seeking time to file rejoinder affidavit because now the Resolution Plan has already been approved by NCLT Mumbai for the respondent. These facts are to be brought on record and hence counsel for the respondent is seeking time which is granted till the next date of hearing.

4.

Bailable warrant issued vide order dated 27.2.2024 is hereby cancelled.

5.

List this matter under the heading "For Directions" on 30.9.2024.