Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench

Tata Communications Limited vs Bangalore Broadband Network Pvt.ltd

Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 11 February 2021 · Citation: (2021) 02 TDSAT CK 0045

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjeev Pandey, Deputy Registrar
CASE NUMBER
Telecom Petition 91 Of 2019
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 181 words

This matter was listed today for framing of issues. Ms. Manaswi Sood, Advocate appears as Proxy Counsel for Mr. Akhil Shankhwar, Advocate

for petitioner and states that she is ready with issues.   Mr. Vidit Monga, Advocate appears as Proxy Counsel for Mr. Nishant Patil, Advocate

for respondent and states on instructions that he has not received the copy of rejoinder affidavit.  Ld. Counsel for petitioner submits that before

filing the rejoinder in the Registry, a copy was duly served on the opposite side by way of Speed Post.  Mr. Rajesh Pant, Desk Officer in the

Registry, after verification of the record, submits that the rejoinder affidavit was filed in the Registry on 21.10.2020, alongwith the copy of Speed Post

receipt.  On last occasion, when the matter was listed on 21.12.2020 for framing of issues no one appeared for respondent.  Mr. Vidit Monga

later states that he will verify from his office whether the rejoinder affidavit was received or not.   List tomorrow i.e. on 12th February, 2021

at 3.30 p.m. for framing of issues.Â