AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
3 paragraphs · 95 wordsM.A no. 139 of 2022
This application has been preferred by the original petitioner/applicant to bring on record the newly appointed Authorised Representative of the petitioner company. Having heard the counsel for the petitioner and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case Mr. Amit Kumar Jain was representative of the petitioner and Ms. Lalita Singh, Senior Manager (legal) is now duly authorised to represent the petitioner company. These facts are taken on record. This M.A. is allowed and disposed of.
List this Broadcasting Petition along with M.A. no. 176 of 2022 on 20.9.2022.