AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
2 paragraphs · 125 wordsV.K. Jhanji, J.
Vide order dated 25.7.1994, petitioner was allowed pre arrest bail on his furnishing surety bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/ to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer. Notice of the petition was given to the respondents for 30.8.1994, on which date, counsel appearing for the State stated that the petitioner had not joined investigation. The petitioner was directed to appear before the S.H.O. Ferozapur Jhirka on 5.9.1994 at 11 a.m. Today, Mr. Deepak Sibal, Advocate, for the State, has stated that the petitioner has since joined investigation. Accordingly, order dated 25.7.1994 whereby the petitioner was allowed prearrest bail on his furnishing surety bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/ to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, is hereby made absolute.