High CourtsSingle Bench

Naresh Kumar and Amrish Kumar vs State of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 26 August 2010 · Citation: (2010) 08 P&H CK 0098

HON’BLE JUDGES
Daya Chaudhary, J
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 143 words

Daya Chaudhary, J.—Mr. Aggarwal, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have joined the investigation and

after presentation of the challan, they have surrendered before the trial Court and furnished their bail bonds and surety bonds to its satisfaction,

whereas learned Counsel for the complainant submits that incomplete challan has been presented.

2.

Mr. Munjal, learned Addl. A.G. Punjab, on instructions from Head Constable Joginder Singh, submits that complete challan has been presented

in the Court.

3.

Since the petitioners have joined the investigation and after presentation of the challan, they have surrendered before the trial Court and

furnished their bail bonds and surety bonds to its satisfaction, the interim order passed in this petition on 27th April, 2010 in the same terms as in

Crl. Misc. No. M-7952 of 2010 is made absolute.

The petition is disposed of accordingly.