High CourtsSingle Bench

Toofani Ansari @ Toofani Sai vs State Of Bihar

Patna High Court · Decided on 20 February 2021 · Citation: (2021) 02 PAT CK 0303

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Arms Act, 1959 — Section 25(1B)(a), 26, 35 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438(2)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 31788 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

25 paragraphs · 526 words
1.

Heard Mr. Ashok Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Nand Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor (hereinafter referred to as

the ‘APP’) for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Mairwa PS Case No. 117 of 2020 dated 15.04.2020, instituted under Sections 25(1-B)(a)/26/35

of the Arms Act, 1959.

3.

The allegation against the petitioner is that when the police on information reached, they found 5-7 suspects out of which five were caught and two

ran away on a black Apache motorcycle. From the co-accused there is recovery of one loaded country-made pistol and also one Hero Passion Pro

motorcycle. The name of the petitioner came in the confessional statement of co-accused Khursed Ali from whom recovery of loaded pistol has been

made.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there is no recovery from him even though the police came to his house and seized the black

Apache motorcycle which is registered in the name of the wife of the petitioner but no recovery of any incriminating material has been found either in

the motorcycle or the house of the petitioner. It was submitted that only on the confessional statement of co-accused he has been implicated in this

case. It was submitted that after implication of the petitioner in the present case, all the present accused have been made accused in a case of the

year 2017 also in which he is on bail. It was further submitted that co-accused Khursed Ali who was arrested and on the basis of whose confessional

statement, the petitioner has been made accused has also been granted bail on 16.12.2020 in Cr. Misc. No. 33078 of 2020.

5.

Learned APP submitted that co-accused has taken the name of the petitioner.

6.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender

before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five

thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in Mairwa PS Case No. 117 of

2020, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and further (i) that one of the bailors shall be a

close relative of the petitioner, (ii) that the petitioner and the bailors shall execute bond with regard to good behaviour of the petitioner, and (iii) that the

petitioner shall also give an undertaking to the Court that he shall not indulge in any illegal/criminal activity, act in violation of any law/statutory

provisions, tamper with the evidence or influence the witnesses. Any violation of the terms and conditions of the bonds or the undertaking shall lead to

cancellation of his bail bonds. The petitioner shall cooperate in the case and be present before the Court on each and every date. Failure to cooperate

or being absent on two consecutive dates, without sufficient cause, shall also lead to cancellation of his bail bonds.

7.

The application stands disposed off in the aforementioned terms.