AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
25 paragraphs · 526 wordsHeard Mr. Ashok Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Nand Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor (hereinafter referred to as
the ‘APP’) for the State.
The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Mairwa PS Case No. 117 of 2020 dated 15.04.2020, instituted under Sections 25(1-B)(a)/26/35
of the Arms Act, 1959.
The allegation against the petitioner is that when the police on information reached, they found 5-7 suspects out of which five were caught and two
ran away on a black Apache motorcycle. From the co-accused there is recovery of one loaded country-made pistol and also one Hero Passion Pro
motorcycle. The name of the petitioner came in the confessional statement of co-accused Khursed Ali from whom recovery of loaded pistol has been
made.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there is no recovery from him even though the police came to his house and seized the black
Apache motorcycle which is registered in the name of the wife of the petitioner but no recovery of any incriminating material has been found either in
the motorcycle or the house of the petitioner. It was submitted that only on the confessional statement of co-accused he has been implicated in this
case. It was submitted that after implication of the petitioner in the present case, all the present accused have been made accused in a case of the
year 2017 also in which he is on bail. It was further submitted that co-accused Khursed Ali who was arrested and on the basis of whose confessional
statement, the petitioner has been made accused has also been granted bail on 16.12.2020 in Cr. Misc. No. 33078 of 2020.
Learned APP submitted that co-accused has taken the name of the petitioner.
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender
before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five
thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in Mairwa PS Case No. 117 of
2020, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and further (i) that one of the bailors shall be a
close relative of the petitioner, (ii) that the petitioner and the bailors shall execute bond with regard to good behaviour of the petitioner, and (iii) that the
petitioner shall also give an undertaking to the Court that he shall not indulge in any illegal/criminal activity, act in violation of any law/statutory
provisions, tamper with the evidence or influence the witnesses. Any violation of the terms and conditions of the bonds or the undertaking shall lead to
cancellation of his bail bonds. The petitioner shall cooperate in the case and be present before the Court on each and every date. Failure to cooperate
or being absent on two consecutive dates, without sufficient cause, shall also lead to cancellation of his bail bonds.
The application stands disposed off in the aforementioned terms.
