High CourtsSingle Bench

Tuku Behera vs State Of Orissa

Orissa High Court · Decided on 20 January 2022 · Citation: (2022) 01 OHC CK 0132

HON’BLE JUDGES
S.K. Panigrahi, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 41 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 294, 506 · Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 — Section 3(1), 3(2)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
CRLMC No. 2859 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

22 paragraphs · 404 words

S.K. Panigrahi, J

1.

This matter is taken up through Video Conferencing mode.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State.

3.

The Petitioner, in this case, has challenged the order dated 09.12.2021 passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum- Special

Judge, Kamakhyanagar in C.T. Special Case No.30 of 2020, arising out of Tumusiga P.S. Case No.137 of 2020 registered under Sections 294/ 506 of

the I.P.C. read with Section 3(1) and 3(2) of the S.C. and S.T. (P.A.) Act, issuing N.B.W. against him.

4.

Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that during the course of investigation of the case, the Investigating Officer had issued notice under

Section 41 of the Cr.P.C. and accordingly, the petitioner attended before the Investigating Officer and he was released on bail by the Investigating

Officer. However, on 09.12.2021, he could not remain present in court due to communication gap between him and his conducting counsel. Hence, the

learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum- Special Judge, Kamakhyanagar issued N.B.W. against the petitioner. He further submits that the

petitioner undertakes that he will cooperate till the end of the trial without fail.

5.

In view of such facts and submissions made by the learned counsel for the Petitioner, this Court is inclined to allow the CRLMC. Accordingly, the

order dated 09.12.2021 passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Kamakhyanagar in the aforesaid case, so far

it relates to issuance of N.B.W. against the petitioner- Tuku Behera is hereby quashed.

6.

The petitioner is directed to surrender before the court in seisin over the matter in the aforesaid case and move for bail within a period of seven

days hence. On such event, the said court shall release him on bail with some stringent conditions so as to enable him to appear before the court on

each date of posting of the case. No coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner till seven days from today.

7.

Accordingly, the CRLMC is disposed of.

8.

As the restrictions due to resurgence of Covid-19 are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a printout of the order available in the

High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the Advocate concerned with his/her seal, in the manner prescribed vide

Court’s Notice No.4587 dated 25th March, 2020 and Court’s Office Order dated 7th January, 2022.

...............................................