High CourtsSingle Bench

Umesh Agarwal And Others vs Mahesh Agarwal And Others

Sikkim High Court · Decided on 1 May 2025 · Citation: (2025) 05 SIK CK 0601

HON’BLE JUDGES
Meenakshi Madan Rai, J
CASE NUMBER
Contempt Case (C) No. 02 Of 2025
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 88 words

Meenakshi Madan Rai, J

Ms. Tara Devi Chettri, Learned Counsel enters appearance for the Respondent No.1 and Mr. Sushant Subba, Learned Counsel for the Respondent No.3 today. Both the Learned Counsel undertake to file Vakalatnama during the course of the day.

Registry reports that the Notice issued to Respondent No.2 is returned with the remarks “Addressee out of station. Hence return to sender”.

Learned Counsel for the Petitioners seeks re-issuance of Notice to the Respondent No.2.

Issue Notice accordingly.

Requisites be filed within three days.

List on 22-05-2025.