High CourtsSingle Bench

Umesh Chandra vs District Magistrate, Nainital & Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 10 March 2021 · Citation: (2021) 03 UK CK 0092

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 253 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 422 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

Petitioner has challenged the recovery citation issued by Tehsildar, Koshyakutoli, District Nainital for recovery of Rs. 2,42,833 + other charges.

2.

Petitioner took a loan from State Bank of India, Branch Dhaniakote, District Nainital. Since, he could not re-pay the loan in time, therefore, respondent-Bank issued a recovery certificate, pursuant to which, Tehsildar has issued a citation for recovery of the amount.

3.

This Court, vide order dated 02.02.2021, had directed that impugned recovery citation shall be kept in abeyance, provided petitioner deposits a sum of Rs. 50,000/- within thirty days of the order. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner had deposited Rs. 50,000/-, though with some delay. He submits that, after issuance of recovery citation, petitioner had deposited another sum of Rs. 60,000/-with the respondent-Bank. Thus, according to him, petitioner is now liable to re-pay a sum of about Rs. 1,20,000/-.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is ready and willing to re-pay the outstanding amount at the earliest, therefore, some reasonable time be given to the petitioner for re-payment of the loan amount.

5.

Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank submits that he has no objection, if petitioner is directed to re-pay the remaining amount in six installments, spread over a period of nine months.

6.

In view of the readiness shown by the petitioner to re-pay the loan and also in view of the consent given by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Bank, the writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:

(i) Petitioner shall approach the bank authorities by making representation on or before 15.04.2021.

(ii) If petitioner makes such representation within the stipulated period alongwith upfront deposit of Rs. 10,000/- to show his bonafide, then the respondent-Bank shall inform the petitioner, within four days from date of receipt of representation alongwith certified copy of this order, about the exact amount, which he is liable to re-pay.

(iii) Petitioner shall repay the outstanding amount in five installments, spread over a period of eight months.

(iv) Recovery charges shall be waived off, if petitioner directly deposits the outstanding amount with the respondent-Bank.

(v) No coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner for a period of nine months, pursuant to the impugned recovery citation.

(vi) In case of any default by the petitioner, he shall not be entitled to protection of this order and respondent/Bank will be free to proceed against him, in accordance with law.

7.

Let a certified copy of this order be issued today itself.